Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Just like the 7640U, the R5 8640U has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640U has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640U is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the chip to be at least 10% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The 8640U has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640U is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen 5 8640UIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Meteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz3600 - 4500 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049FP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT816 TOPS INT811 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB
Die Size178 mm2
Chip AI31 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640U
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 125H
35.7 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 102.6     median: 102.3 (51%)     max: 108 Points
96 Points (48%)
min: 97     avg: 100.2     median: 100 (50%)     max: 102.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
581 Points (11%)
min: 331     avg: 638     median: 668 (12%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
10433 Points (10%)
min: 9194     avg: 12514     median: 12989 (12%)     max: 14564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (71%)     max: 1815 Points
1651 Points (67%)
min: 1549     avg: 1661     median: 1655 (67%)     max: 1735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
644 Points (70%)
min: 622     avg: 640     median: 633 (69%)     max: 664 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
4096 Points (10%)
min: 3673     avg: 4830     median: 4948 (12%)     max: 5618 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
1663 Points (10%)
min: 1700     avg: 1996     median: 2077 (13%)     max: 2245 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
256 Points (71%)
min: 235     avg: 242.6     median: 246 (68%)     max: 251 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
19 Points (25%)
min: 21.9     avg: 25.6     median: 26.7 (34%)     max: 27.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
3 Points (72%)
min: 2.86     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 3.03 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
7211 Points (44%)
min: 8948     avg: 9295     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9561 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
34915 Points (25%)
min: 45559     avg: 50476     median: 51477.5 (37%)     max: 53390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
min: 78788     avg: 78803     median: 78802.5 (50%)     max: 78817 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
min: 12858     avg: 13070     median: 13069.5 (16%)     max: 13281 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
min: 148.994     avg: 231     median: 247 (3%)     max: 296.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
min: 4.107     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.5 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
5930 Points (9%)
min: 5594     avg: 7773     median: 6209 (10%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
47187 MIPS (27%)
0 MIPS (0%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
6018 MIPS (71%)
min: 4663     avg: 4950     median: 5004 (59%)     max: 5136 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (3%)     max: 154.15 fps
94.8 fps (2%)
min: 129.6     avg: 132     median: 132.3 (3%)     max: 134 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (8%)     max: 325 fps
238 fps (6%)
min: 304.5     avg: 306.1     median: 305.3 (8%)     max: 308.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
11.9 fps (21%)
min: 9.7     avg: 13.5     median: 13.8 (24%)     max: 16.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (26%)
min: 0.817     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (25%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
9.2 GB/s (24%)
min: 8.8     avg: 8.9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
499 Seconds (6%)
min: 391     avg: 500     median: 435 (6%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
301 Seconds (2%)
min: 228     avg: 278.7     median: 248 (2%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.4898     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.565 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (21%)     max: 14729 Points
13014 Points (22%)
min: 12498     avg: 13652     median: 13866 (23%)     max: 13971 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
7.6 s (2%)
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.744 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
18.4 s (1%)
min: 16.446     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.967 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
670 s (3%)
min: 394.697     avg: 406.3     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 423.565 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
min: 43778     avg: 65927     median: 71115.5 (55%)     max: 71915 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
15121 Points (37%)
min: 12766     avg: 16294     median: 16940 (42%)     max: 17992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
76663 Points (62%)
min: 69572     avg: 72139     median: 72618 (59%)     max: 73481 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
min: 69751     avg: 71822     median: 72061.5 (58%)     max: 73412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (71%)     max: 91995 Points
min: 79411     avg: 83102     median: 84374 (68%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
12271 Points (31%)
min: 14164     avg: 14874     median: 14955 (38%)     max: 15261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
18779 Points (33%)
min: 16291     avg: 21020     median: 21944 (39%)     max: 22978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
6578 Points (28%)
min: 6216     avg: 8197     median: 8719 (37%)     max: 9182 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (56%)     max: 2473 Points
2464 Points (57%)
min: 2199     avg: 2277     median: 2288 (53%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (42%)     max: 13656 Points
9903 Points (34%)
min: 11087     avg: 11404     median: 11411.5 (39%)     max: 11749 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2261     median: 2280.5 (72%)     max: 2314 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 10787     avg: 11569     median: 11714 (48%)     max: 12061 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (59%)     max: 1824 Points
1822 Points (61%)
min: 1593     avg: 1657     median: 1668 (56%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
8507 Points (15%)
min: 9069     avg: 10217     median: 10309 (18%)     max: 10856 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
min: 1596     avg: 1628     median: 1627.5 (7%)     max: 1659 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
min: 10676     avg: 10712     median: 10711.5 (34%)     max: 10747 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
min: 6734     avg: 6816     median: 6750 (67%)     max: 6964 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (43%)     max: 46412 Points
min: 38648     avg: 38726     median: 38736 (38%)     max: 38793 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7340 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
31951 Points (42%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
551 ms (1%)
min: 560     avg: 580     median: 575 (1%)     max: 607 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (58%)     max: 97162 Points
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (56%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (63%)     max: 309 Points
235 Points (58%)
min: 222     avg: 231.3     median: 231 (57%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (47%)     max: 299 Points
272 Points (46%)
min: 245     avg: 253.7     median: 254 (43%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (59%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1480     avg: 1558     median: 1540.5 (54%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
35.6 Watt (6%)
min: 41.3     avg: 64.4     median: 62.2 (11%)     max: 90.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 56.7     avg: 70.7     median: 64.3 (12%)     max: 89.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
5 Watt (3%)
min: 4.31     avg: 8     median: 6.4 (4%)     max: 14.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.83     avg: 8     median: 7.8 (6%)     max: 18.5 Watt
10.4 Watt (8%)
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (5%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 24     avg: 28     median: 28 (21%)     max: 31.3 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 100% n=40

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U → 84% n=40

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 90% n=40

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 16. 21:29:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16405 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773692961s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Mar 2026 05:14:35 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.002s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16405 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 16405 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.002s ... 0.028s

#13 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.002s ... 0.03s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.05s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.09s

#17 return log +0.125s ... 0.215s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)