Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 235HX

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is a fast mid-range mobile CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 20 cores consisting of 6 of the 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 of the 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed. The CPU can access 24 MB L2 cache and 26 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with three of the four Xe cores running at 300 - 1800 MHz.

Performance - High End

Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should be just before or at the level of the Raptor Lake Core i9-14500HX (6 + 8 cores, max 5 / 3.5 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming (2024 games) and content creation. The performance difference to the Core Ultra 5 245HX is only slight, as the CPUs only differ in the base clock of the performance cores (2.9 vs 3.1 GHz).

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.5 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 2000 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 285HX should be slightly below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should outperform the old Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 235HXIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX
CodenameArrow Lake-HXArrow Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX compare2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX « 2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX « 2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX compare2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock2600 - 5100 MHz2100 - 5500 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB40 MB
L3 Cache26 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 14
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
24 / 24
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt160 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 2000 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT813 TOPS INT8
Chip AI27 TOPS INT836 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285HX
47.9 pt (80%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126.3     avg: 130.3     median: 130.3 (65%)     max: 134.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1907     avg: 2103     median: 2102.5 (39%)     max: 2298 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 35165     avg: 37641     median: 37641 (35%)     max: 40117 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2057     avg: 2121     median: 2121 (86%)     max: 2185 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 799     avg: 820     median: 820 (89%)     max: 841 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13758     avg: 14755     median: 14754.5 (36%)     max: 15751 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5427     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (37%)     max: 6232 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 307     avg: 315.5     median: 315.5 (87%)     max: 324 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 106470     avg: 117624     median: 117624 (68%)     max: 128778 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6665     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (79%)     max: 6822 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 36.5     avg: 40.4     median: 40.4 (71%)     max: 44.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 147     median: 147 (2%)     max: 162 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 83     avg: 90.5     median: 90.5 (1%)     max: 98 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4012     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4298 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20813     avg: 25013     median: 25013 (62%)     max: 29213 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
108978 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
109217 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
112055 Points (90%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 25440     avg: 27286     median: 27285.5 (69%)     max: 29131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 47030     avg: 49342     median: 49341.5 (88%)     max: 51653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16247     avg: 17008     median: 17008 (72%)     max: 17769 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1767 Points (41%)
min: 2907     avg: 2998     median: 2997.5 (69%)     max: 3088 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
11564 Points (45%)
min: 20630     avg: 21367     median: 21367 (83%)     max: 22104 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2121     avg: 2177     median: 2176.5 (73%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24910     avg: 25960     median: 25960 (47%)     max: 27010 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 408     avg: 421.5     median: 421.5 (0%)     max: 435 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 311     avg: 313.5     median: 313.5 (82%)     max: 316 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 327     avg: 344.5     median: 344.5 (62%)     max: 362 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2208     avg: 2216     median: 2215.5 (83%)     max: 2223 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 168.7     avg: 218.4     median: 218.4 (38%)     max: 268 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 245     avg: 267     median: 267 (49%)     max: 289 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.7     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (22%)     max: 35.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
34.3 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.6     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (16%)     max: 22.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX → 177% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 08. 08:40:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18896 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18884 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762587636s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:20:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18896 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 18896 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18884 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 18884 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.036s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.038s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)