, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Intel UHD Graphics P630

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 (GT2) is a professional integrated graphics card, which can be found in various Xeon desktop and notebook processors of the Coffee-Lake generation. The "GT2" version of the GPU offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) and the clocks depend on the CPU model. Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD P630 has to access the main memory (2x 64-bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133). Compared to the older HD Graphics P630 (Kaby-Lake), the newer UHD GPU is identical but can be clocked slightly higher. Compared to the regular UHD 630, the P630 supports ECC main memory and is intended for professional applications.

Performance

The exact performance of the UHD Graphics P630 depends on various factors like TDP, L3 Cache, memory (DDR3/DDR4) and maximum clock rate of the specific model. However, it should be fairly similar to the HD Graphics 530 and HD Graphics 630 and therefore only suited for low demanding games like Overwatch or Farming Simulator 2017 (low details).

Features

The features of the UHD P630 are the same as for the HD 630 and therefore H.265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth are supported in hardware. Furthermore, HDCP 2.2 is also supported in all chips, which allows Netflix 4K videos, for instance. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics P630 can be found in several notebook and desktop processors of different TDP classes.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 550 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used for 28-Watt models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 550.

The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU probably still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1100 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 650 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Compared to the Iris Plus 640 from the 15-Watt models, the Iris 650 only has a slightly higher maximum clock as well as almost twice the TDP, which allows a better utilization of the Turbo Boost potential.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 650 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7567U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 650 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used for 28-Watt processor and therefore medium-sized notebooks.

Intel UHD Graphics P630Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Gen. 9.5 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameCoffee-Lake-GT2Kaby Lake GT3e
ArchitectureGen. 9.5Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Pipelines24 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.10.2017 03.01.2017
Memory TypeDDR4
CPU in UHD Graphics P630GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Xeon W-10885M8 x 2400 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon E-2276M6 x 2800 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon E-2176G6 x 3700 MHz, 80 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon W-10855M6 x 2800 MHz, 45 W350 MHz? MHz
min. - max.350 MHz? - 1200 MHz
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-7567U2 x 3500 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-7287U2 x 3300 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-7267U2 x 3100 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i3-7167U2 x 2800 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.300 - 350 MHz1000 - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
623 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
555 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
161538 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8403     avg: 9150     median: 9149.5 (12%)     max: 9896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
13153 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1586     avg: 1655     median: 1655 (4%)     max: 1724 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1698 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
2924 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2762 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
3DMark 06
15175 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
8773 (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
45.2 fps (19%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.21     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (17%)     max: 77 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.3 % (99%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
336 Samples/s (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
813 Samples/s (3%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1730 (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (9%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
998 MHz (52%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
848 MHz (34%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
64  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
14.2  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
113  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
56.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
38.9  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
51.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.2  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
10.5  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
39.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15.2  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
32.4  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
37.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
36.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
19.9  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
46.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
29.5  fps
low 1024x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
42.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.2  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
19.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
14.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
8.2  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
79.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
57.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.4  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
30  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
32  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15  fps
low 1024x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
18.3  fps
low 1024x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
35.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.8  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
95  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
64  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
29.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25  fps
low 1024x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.4  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
56.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
49.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
5  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
84  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.4  fps
high 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
46.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
13.3  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 22. 20:41:02

#0 checking url part for id 9906 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7655 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9906 +0.025s ... 0.076s

#8 got single benchmarks 9906 +0s ... 0.076s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7655 +0s ... 0.077s

#10 got single benchmarks 7655 +0.007s ... 0.084s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.091s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.091s

#14 Got 51 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.096s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.096s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.099s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.01s ... 0.108s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.108s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.111s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)