Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake, Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card in the Jasper Lake Celeron SoCs for laptops and small desktops. It is the mid range GPU version in the Jasper Lake series (Celeron Quad-Cores) and offers 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch there are two Celeron models (N5100 with 6W and N5105 with 10W) clocked at 350 - 800 MHz.

Thanks to the improved architecture and more EUs, the UHD Graphics is clearly faster than the old Gemini Lake SoCs (e.g. N5000).

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Jasper Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the 10nm process (like Ice Lake probably) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs Elkhart Lake (Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card (iGPU) in the Elkhart Lake Pentium and Celeron SoCs (e.g., Pentium J6226). It was announced in early 2021 and is used in the high end Elkhart Lake CPUs. It uses all 32 execution units and offers no dedicated graphics memory. The clock speed depends on the CPU model and ranges from 4000 MHz (minimal base clock speed) up to 850 MHz (highest Boost clock).

The gaming performance is very low and only very low demanding 3D games should be playable. The slower 16 EU variant was even struggling in our Dota 2 benchmark.

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)
Gen. 11 Series
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGen. 11Gen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11
Pipelines24 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed350 - 800 (Boost) MHz400 - 850 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5, OpenCL 1.2
Power Consumption4.8 - 10 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm10 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement11.01.2021 11.01.2021
Displays3 Displays (max.)
PredecessorUHD Graphics 600
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N51054 x 2000 MHz, 10 W450 MHz800 MHz
Intel Celeron N51004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W350 MHz800 MHz
min. - max.350 - 450 MHz800 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
355 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
312 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
6659 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
8388 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1043 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1106 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1654 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1458 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
36.9 fps (2%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.1 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
19.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
24.4 dB(A) (39%)

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
20.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
13.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
12.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
13.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
73.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
24.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
16.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
15.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
21.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
14.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
7.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU):
3.9  fps

Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) → 100%

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1120.813.312.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark13.7
Dota 2 Reborn73.824.116.815.5
The Witcher 321.614.47.83.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3

1
3


3


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 03:05:45

#0 checking url part for id 10642 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11419 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.133s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.133s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.133s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10642 +0.043s ... 0.176s

#8 got single benchmarks 10642 +0.018s ... 0.194s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11419 +0.002s ... 0.195s

#10 got single benchmarks 11419 +0s ... 0.196s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.196s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.259s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.259s

#14 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.263s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.263s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.267s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.011s ... 0.278s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.278s

#19 return log +0.049s ... 0.327s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)