Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

Intel Core 2 Duo U7700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 is an ultra-low-voltage (ULV) processor for laptops that was released in 2006. It is based on the Merom core and offers 64-Bit support and a low TDP of 10 Watt. The U7700 is the fastest model in the U7000 series with a clock rate of 1.33 GHz (U7500 1.1 GHz, U7600 1.2 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5250

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

► remove from comparison

OEM Prozessor

1.0375 - 1.3 V

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64 (Intel's x86-64 implementation), XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), LaGrande Technology (Intel Trusted Execution Technology) Virtualization Technology

Die size: 111 mm²

Steppings: L2, M0

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5250Intel Core 2 Duo T5450
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Clock1330 MHz1500 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533667667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm0.8 - 0.975V65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo U7700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U7700 +
1335 Points (12%)
125%
1 T5450 +
min: 1015     avg: 1504     median: 1666 (15%)     max: 1669 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U7700 +
2515 Points (3%)
124%
1 T5450 +
min: 1919     avg: 2827     median: 3121.5 (4%)     max: 3144 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5250 +
58.2 s (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1047 Points (2%)
1298 Points (3%)
min: 1344     avg: 1381     median: 1367 (3%)     max: 1433 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5250 +
36 s (8%)
100%
1 T5450 +
min: 33.62     avg: 33.8     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 34 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
15268 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
10407 MFLOPS (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
2460 Points (15%)
min: 2702     avg: 3105     median: 2892 (18%)     max: 3720 Points
min: 3322     avg: 3505     median: 3501 (22%)     max: 3813 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5450 +
4 Points (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 → 121% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 → 136% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 10. 21:35:09

#0 checking url part for id 385 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 361 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 336 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 385 +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 got single benchmarks 385 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 361 +0s ... 0.014s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#28 got single benchmarks 361 +0.012s ... 0.027s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 336 +0s ... 0.027s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#31 got single benchmarks 336 +0.017s ... 0.045s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.045s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.051s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#67 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.052s

#68 return log +0s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)