Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron M U3600 vs Intel Celeron M P4500

Intel Celeron M U3600

► remove from comparison Intel U3600

The Intel Celeron U3600 is an entry level CPU for thin and light laptops. It is based on the Arrandale core (Core i3/i5) but Turbo Boost (for the CPU), Hyper-Threading, VT-d Virtualization, Trusted Execution, and AES functions are disabled. Compared to the U5400, the U3600 may support VT-x Virtualization Technology but features a smaller Level 3 cache. Due to the slow clock speed, the U3400 is only sufficient for non demanding applications.

The Arrandale Pentium CPU features the integrated Intel HD Graphics graphics card which is clocked at 166-500 MHz (due to Turbo Boost). Furthermore, the CPU also features an integrated memory controller that supports up to 8 GB of DDR3-800 main memory.

Intel Celeron M P4500

► remove from comparison Intel P4500

The Intel Celeron P4500 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 1.68 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Celeron series had).

The P4500 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 766MHz due to Turbo Boost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is relatively low, because of the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller.

ModelIntel Celeron M U3600Intel Celeron M P4500
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameArrandaleArrandale
Series: Celeron M Arrandale
Intel Celeron M P4600 compare2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M P45001.86 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron M U36001.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U3400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M P4600 compare2 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron M P45001.86 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U36001.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U3400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock1200 MHz1860 MHz
FSB25002500
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP18 Watt35 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
32 nm32 nm0.8-1.4 (High Frequency Mode) 0.775 - 1 (Low Frequency Mode)
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
SocketBGA1288PGA988
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L1 Cache128 KB
max. Temp.90 °C
$86 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M P4500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 P4500 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P4500 +
2533 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P4500 +
4826 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P4500 +
1141 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P4500 +
37.1 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P4500 +
24 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P4500 +
56 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P4500 +
1284 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P4500 +
15781 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P4500 +
10767 MFLOPS (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M P4500 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 19. 04:25:55

#0 checking url part for id 1561 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 727 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1561 +0s ... 0.008s

#13 got single benchmarks 1561 +0s ... 0.008s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 727 +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 got single benchmarks 727 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.015s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.018s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.032s ... 0.05s

#30 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)