Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T770 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820

UNISOC Tangula T770

► remove from comparison  Tangula T770

The Unisoc T770 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

MediaTek Dimensity 820

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 820

The Mediatek Dimensity 820 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.6 GHz and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 5 core ARM Mali-G57 MC5 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding. The Dimensity 820 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

ModelUNISOC Tangula T770MediaTek Dimensity 820
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8202 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7702 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 8202 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7702 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 - 2500 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm7 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.6 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G57 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 780 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP5
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 820

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 820
44.5 pt (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
32166 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
3969 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4169 Points (61%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
622 Points (30%)
652 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2226 Points (8%)
2678 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2763 Points (32%)
3022 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8087 Points (10%)
10658 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1536 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1889 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
13894 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6935 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7836 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3032 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
18974 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
79672 Points (67%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
68754 Points (55%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
123943 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
129050 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
401419 Points (39%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
10459 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
25698 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11263 Points (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
16302 Points (82%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 820 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 21:23:19

#0 checking url part for id 14025 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12753 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.041s ... 0.045s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 14025 +0s ... 0.048s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#19 got single benchmarks 14025 +0.005s ... 0.054s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 12753 +0.003s ... 0.058s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#25 got single benchmarks 12753 +0.005s ... 0.064s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.065s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.066s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.066s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.067s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.07s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.07s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#63 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.073s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#65 return log +0.004s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)