Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U

UNISOC Tangula T760

► remove from comparison  Tangula T760

The Unisoc T760 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with two clusters. Four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and four small ARM-Cortex-A55 cores at again up to 2 GHz for efficiency. The faster T770 SoC offers higher clocked A76 cores in comparison (up to 2.5 GHz for a single core).

One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800U

The Mediatek Dimensity 800U is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.4 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 3 core ARM Mali-G57 MC3 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the Dimensity 820, the 800U offers lower clocked A76 cores and a slower GPU.

The Dimensity 800U is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

ModelUNISOC Tangula T760MediaTek Dimensity 800U
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 800U2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 - 2000 MHz2000 - 2400 MHz
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm7 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)2x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.4 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 650 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 800U

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800U
37.8 pt (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
22364 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3205     avg: 3320     median: 3259 (41%)     max: 3497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3095     avg: 3281     median: 3236 (47%)     max: 3512 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4054 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4655 Points (42%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12938 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6203 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8035 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 596     avg: 600     median: 599 (29%)     max: 606 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1776     avg: 1785     median: 1779.5 (6%)     max: 1805 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3013     avg: 3669     median: 3298 (4%)     max: 4695 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9999     avg: 14917     median: 16629 (17%)     max: 18123 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 45     avg: 50     median: 47 (12%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
64343 Points (54%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
72545 Points (58%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
89035 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
105171 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
331094 Points (32%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
min: 3336     avg: 12939     median: 12938.5 (2%)     max: 22541 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
17258 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7087     avg: 7337     median: 7337 (40%)     max: 7587 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3228 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
19054 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8738     avg: 9893     median: 9892.5 (65%)     max: 11047 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 10527     avg: 13283     median: 13283 (66%)     max: 16039 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (14%)
012345Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
1.1 Watt (4%)
00.10.10.20.20.30.40.40.50.60.60.70.70.80.90.9111.11.2Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 01. 23:01:35

#0 checking url part for id 14027 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12955 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.049s ... 0.055s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.058s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.058s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.058s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 14027 +0s ... 0.059s

#17 got single benchmarks 14027 +0s ... 0.059s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.061s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.063s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 12955 +0.001s ... 0.064s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.064s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#24 got single benchmarks 12955 +0.013s ... 0.077s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.081s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.081s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s ... 0.102s

#81 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.11s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.032s ... 0.142s

#83 return log +0.004s ... 0.146s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)