Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove Intel T9600

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

► remove

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 is an entry to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn architecture, but features only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6670, the T6600 does not feature Virtualization features in hardware and is speced at a lower maximum temperature.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6600.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3060 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2920 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2800 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2500 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1860 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3060 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2920 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2500 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2200 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66002200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1860 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
2800 MHz2200 MHz
1066800
6 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
35 35
410 410
45 1.05-1.2125 V45 1.00-1.25V
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C105 °C
Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
$316 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
128 KB
Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, SSE4.1

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (32%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2391     median: 2355 (24%)     max: 2631 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (10%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 4335     avg: 4525     median: 4472 (8%)     max: 4833 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 4229     avg: 4727     median: 4864.5 (6%)     max: 4948 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 2257     avg: 2454     median: 2463 (23%)     max: 2633 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
min: 877.11     avg: 900     median: 899.6 (11%)     max: 922.1 seconds
min: 1190     avg: 2015     median: 2268.7 (27%)     max: 2331 seconds
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 seconds
min: 37     avg: 63.1     median: 71.1 (14%)     max: 73.336 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (17%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1942     median: 1947 (13%)     max: 1989 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 Seconds
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 Seconds
min: 54     avg: 59     median: 60.5 (3%)     max: 61 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
min: 1032.5     avg: 1051     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1087.85 Seconds
min: 1322     avg: 1334     median: 1334.5 (6%)     max: 1343 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
min: 20109     avg: 20199     median: 20216 (10%)     max: 20254 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
min: 14760     avg: 15060     median: 15119.5 (12%)     max: 15241 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
min: 3511     avg: 4691     median: 4746.5 (30%)     max: 5758 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - CPU
5.6 Points (80%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (73%)     max: 5.7 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (8%)     max: 5706 Points
min: 4198     avg: 4217     median: 4216.5 (6%)     max: 4235 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 → 86%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.13
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)