The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.
Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 100%n=10
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 86%n=10
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 84%n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 20. 11:42:46
#0 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:08:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0.002s ... 0.032s
#8 got single benchmarks 397 +0.029s ... 0.06s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0.002s ... 0.062s
#10 got single benchmarks 421 +0.012s ... 0.074s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.002s ... 0.076s
#12 got single benchmarks 380 +0.046s ... 0.122s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.211s