Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.

Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

► remove from comparison Intel P8800

The Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.66 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. Due to the smaller cache (Core 2 Duo T-Models got usually 6 MB at this clock rate), the TDP is only 25 Watt (instead of the 35 Watt of the T-models).

Due to the relatively high clock speed, modern games (in 2009) should not be limited by the CPU speed (in conjunction with a middle class graphics card). High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Dual Core instead (when using a high end GPU).

The P8800 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 1200 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo P8800 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2800 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.2125 V45 nm, 1.00V-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)BGA479, PGA478
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$241 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
L1 Cache128 KB
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 P8800 +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 2798     avg: 2890     median: 2932 (26%)     max: 2940 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 5240     avg: 5357     median: 5370 (7%)     max: 5460 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
min: 982     avg: 994     median: 993.5 (12%)     max: 1005 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
min: 30.8     avg: 31.4     median: 31.4 (6%)     max: 31.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 2309     avg: 2355     median: 2355 (5%)     max: 2401 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
min: 19     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
min: 44     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
min: 961     avg: 1049     median: 1048.5 (5%)     max: 1136 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
min: 24450     avg: 26155     median: 26155 (12%)     max: 27860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
18000 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9600 +
5.6 Points (80%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P8800 +
6.3 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points
4658 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 → 95% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 03. 15:59:15

#0 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 477 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 got single benchmarks 397 +0.018s ... 0.029s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 477 +0s ... 0.029s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#50 got single benchmarks 477 +0.008s ... 0.038s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#111 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.048s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#113 return log +0.004s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)