The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It was intended to be used in the Santa Rosa platform due to the 800 MHz FSB. The T9550 is only slightly higher clocked but offers already a FSB1066.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9500 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 is a power efficient ULV subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 → 52%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 16. 22:26:15
#0 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 425 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.029s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0.003s ... 0.032s
#8 got single benchmarks 449 +0.03s ... 0.062s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0.003s ... 0.064s
#10 got single benchmarks 376 +0.021s ... 0.086s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 425 +0.003s ... 0.088s
#12 got single benchmarks 425 +0.018s ... 0.107s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.088s ... 0.195s
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card