The Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It was intended to be used in the Santa Rosa platform due to the 800 MHz FSB. The T9550 is only slightly higher clocked but offers already a FSB1066.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9500 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo SL9380 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.8 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core. Compared to the SL9400, the SL9380 offers only an FSB with 800 MHz clock rate (instead of 1066) and exactly 1.8 GHz (SL9400 1.86).
The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 29. 13:04:35
#0 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0.002s ... 0.037s
#8 got single benchmarks 376 +0.025s ... 0.063s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0.002s ... 0.065s
#10 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.065s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.002s ... 0.067s
#12 got single benchmarks 422 +0.015s ... 0.082s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.142s