The Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 was a uppder middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9500 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt).
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9400 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9400 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → 100%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 89%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 88%n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 21. 09:24:25
#0 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0.002s ... 0.029s
#8 got single benchmarks 393 +0.079s ... 0.108s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0.002s ... 0.11s
#10 got single benchmarks 453 +0.046s ... 0.157s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.002s ... 0.158s
#12 got single benchmarks 380 +0.044s ... 0.203s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.203s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.087s ... 0.29s