The Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 was a uppder middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9500 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt).
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9400 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9400 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo SL9380 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.8 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core. Compared to the SL9400, the SL9380 offers only an FSB with 800 MHz clock rate (instead of 1066) and exactly 1.8 GHz (SL9400 1.86).
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 28. 20:59:18
#0 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0s ... 0.011s
#8 got single benchmarks 393 +0.022s ... 0.033s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0s ... 0.033s
#10 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.033s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0s ... 0.034s
#12 got single benchmarks 421 +0.009s ... 0.042s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.049s