The Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 was at the time of announcement a fast dual-core CPU for laptops with 3 MB level 2 cache. It is based on the Penryn core with all features enabled (but without the full 6MB level 2 cache). The later announced Core 2 Duo P7450 was cheaper and used less power.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 is a laptop processor based on the Penryn core. It offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and is therefore slower than other 2.3 GHz clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.22
log 03. 05:58:29
#0 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 468 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.028s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0.002s ... 0.03s
#8 got single benchmarks 379 +0.05s ... 0.08s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 468 +0.002s ... 0.082s
#10 got single benchmarks 468 +0s ... 0.082s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0.002s ... 0.084s
#12 got single benchmarks 453 +0.052s ... 0.136s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.205s