The Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 was at the time of announcement a fast dual-core CPU for laptops with 3 MB level 2 cache. It is based on the Penryn core with all features enabled (but without the full 6MB level 2 cache). The later announced Core 2 Duo P7450 was cheaper and used less power.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 is a low power laptop processor for small and slim laptops. It features the full 6 MB level 2 cache and all features of the Penryn core (e.g. VT-x and Trusted Execution). Due to the large cache, the CPU shows a good performance for the small clock rate. However, in the MacBook Air, the CPU throttled very often, leading to the slower benchmarks in our database.
Compared to other Core 2 Duo models, the C2D SL9600 only supports the socket BGA956 and is soldered in the MacBook Air models.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → 100%n=8
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 86%n=8
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 93%n=8
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 18. 07:34:47
#0 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0.003s ... 0.031s
#8 got single benchmarks 379 +0.056s ... 0.086s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0.004s ... 0.09s
#10 got single benchmarks 516 +0.014s ... 0.104s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.003s ... 0.107s
#12 got single benchmarks 380 +0.04s ... 0.147s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.129s ... 0.276s