The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 100%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 88%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 82%n=9
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 30. 13:18:24
#0 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.002s ... 0.026s
#8 got single benchmarks 339 +0.012s ... 0.038s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.04s
#10 got single benchmarks 322 +0.096s ... 0.136s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.002s ... 0.138s
#12 got single benchmarks 340 +0.038s ... 0.176s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.176s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.097s ... 0.273s