Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2400 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478 PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
$307 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (23%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (6%)     max: 4665 Points
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1266 s (6%)
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22156 MIPS (11%)
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.3 Points (76%)
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 85% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 03. 16:13:51

#0 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0s ... 0.004s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#41 got single benchmarks 323 +0.022s ... 0.026s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.027s

#44 got single benchmarks 438 +0.018s ... 0.046s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#104 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)