Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Intel Core 2 Duo T7600

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.

At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.

Modern Penryn based Core  2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache nad Virtualization functions VT-x.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7600Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2330 MHz2000 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm1.0375-1.3V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478 PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$619 U.S.$234 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7600Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 1971     avg: 2040     median: 2040 (18%)     max: 2109 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 3600     avg: 3733     median: 3732.5 (5%)     max: 3865 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1972     avg: 1997     median: 2004 (4%)     max: 2015 Points
min: 1194     avg: 1680     median: 1729 (4%)     max: 1764 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7600 +
min: 252     avg: 257.3     median: 260 (100%)     max: 260 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22 s (5%)
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 24.48 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 55     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
min: 56     avg: 58.2     median: 59 (3%)     max: 59.7 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1416     avg: 1455     median: 1455 (6%)     max: 1494 s
min: 1433     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (7%)     max: 1542 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 14271     avg: 21111     median: 21110.5 (10%)     max: 27950 MIPS
18090 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 10407     avg: 13696     median: 13695.5 (11%)     max: 16984 MFLOPS
12664 MFLOPS (10%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7600 +
734 Points (50%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7600 +
2422 Points (100%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7600 +
2215 Points (100%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7600 +
7311 Points (98%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4703     avg: 4891     median: 4844 (30%)     max: 5127 Points
min: 3396     avg: 4396     median: 4297.5 (27%)     max: 5250 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7300 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7300 +
3473 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 93% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 17:48:02

#0 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 got single benchmarks 162 +0.014s ... 0.022s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0s ... 0.022s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#44 got single benchmarks 324 +0.035s ... 0.058s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#108 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.067s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#110 return log +0.004s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)