The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache nad Virtualization functions VT-x.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 95%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 95%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 28. 13:58:04
#0 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.003s ... 0.022s
#8 got single benchmarks 162 +0.027s ... 0.049s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.002s ... 0.052s
#10 got single benchmarks 407 +0.025s ... 0.077s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0.002s ... 0.08s
#12 got single benchmarks 324 +0.064s ... 0.144s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.144s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.07s ... 0.213s