The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 121%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 102%n=6
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 29. 14:41:32
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.035s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.036s ... 0.071s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.003s ... 0.073s
#10 got single benchmarks 339 +0.012s ... 0.086s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0.002s ... 0.088s
#12 got single benchmarks 439 +0.008s ... 0.096s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.165s