Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7400Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2160 MHz2400 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.$307 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7400Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (23%)     max: 2598 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (6%)     max: 4665 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7400 +
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
1266 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
22156 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7400 +
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7400 +
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7400 +
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (29%)     max: 4859 Points
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 110% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 03. 16:30:07

#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 got single benchmarks 164 +0.018s ... 0.028s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0s ... 0.029s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.029s

#44 got single benchmarks 323 +0.026s ... 0.055s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#105 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.065s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#107 return log +0.004s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)