The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 98%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 108%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 07. 04:17:51
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 04 Dec 2022 10:20:04 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.023s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.033s ... 0.057s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.002s ... 0.058s
#10 got single benchmarks 407 +0.027s ... 0.085s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.002s ... 0.086s
#12 got single benchmarks 339 +0.009s ... 0.096s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.149s