The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=2
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 81%n=2
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 113%n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 26. 08:40:02
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.02s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.03s ... 0.051s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0.002s ... 0.053s
#10 got single benchmarks 390 +0.021s ... 0.074s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.002s ... 0.076s
#12 got single benchmarks 323 +0.042s ... 0.118s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.177s