Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache nad Virtualization functions VT-x.

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo L7100
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1200 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt17 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$234 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1971     avg: 2040     median: 2040 (18%)     max: 2109 Points
1290 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3600     avg: 3733     median: 3732.5 (5%)     max: 3865 Points
2294 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1194     avg: 1680     median: 1729 (4%)     max: 1764 Points
995 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 24.48 s
41 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 56     avg: 58.2     median: 59 (3%)     max: 59.7 s
90 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1433     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (7%)     max: 1542 s
2181 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18090 MIPS (9%)
10503 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12664 MFLOPS (10%)
7645 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3396     avg: 4396     median: 4297.5 (27%)     max: 5250 Points
3871 Points (24%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7300 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7300 +
3473 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 → 76% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 10:47:41

#0 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 386 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 324 +0.033s ... 0.04s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 386 +0s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#44 got single benchmarks 386 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#91 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#93 return log +0.004s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)