The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 122%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 103%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 20. 04:15:10
#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.028s
#8 got single benchmarks 340 +0.049s ... 0.077s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.003s ... 0.08s
#10 got single benchmarks 339 +0.013s ... 0.094s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.003s ... 0.097s