Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm1.075V-1.175V65 nm1.075V-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (19%)     max: 2093 Points
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (19%)     max: 2316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (5%)     max: 3822 Points
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (5%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
45 s (9%)
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
1492 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
16620 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (25%)     max: 3948 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 97% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 11:42:35

#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 340 +0.021s ... 0.028s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0s ... 0.028s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#44 got single benchmarks 442 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.037s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#106 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.045s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#108 return log +0.004s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)