The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100%n=5
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 101%n=5
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 91%n=5
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 19. 09:32:56
#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.022s
#8 got single benchmarks 340 +0.052s ... 0.074s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.004s ... 0.078s
#10 got single benchmarks 438 +0.044s ... 0.122s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0.003s ... 0.125s
#12 got single benchmarks 390 +0.018s ... 0.143s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.097s ... 0.241s