The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 101%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 19. 04:35:34
#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.023s
#8 got single benchmarks 340 +0.042s ... 0.065s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.003s ... 0.067s
#10 got single benchmarks 407 +0.023s ... 0.09s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.003s ... 0.093s
#12 got single benchmarks 168 +0.079s ... 0.172s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.172s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.255s