Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1660 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm1.075V-1.175V65 nm1.0375-1.3V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (19%)     max: 2093 Points
min: 1656     avg: 1717     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1836 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (5%)     max: 3822 Points
min: 3026     avg: 3190     median: 3069 (4%)     max: 3476 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
min: 1339     avg: 1387     median: 1392 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5500 +
204 Points (78%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (7%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
83 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
1923 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
min: 15145     avg: 16727     median: 15195 (7%)     max: 19840 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
min: 7386     avg: 9338     median: 10261 (8%)     max: 10367 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5500 +
532 Points (36%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 4776     avg: 5083     median: 4898 (66%)     max: 5787 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 → 87% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 11:35:19

#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 340 +0.022s ... 0.028s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0s ... 0.028s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.029s

#44 got single benchmarks 174 +0.029s ... 0.058s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.067s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#108 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.068s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.026s ... 0.095s

#110 return log +0.004s ... 0.098s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)