The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 116%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 110%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 26. 20:53:49
#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.002s ... 0.023s
#8 got single benchmarks 168 +0.085s ... 0.107s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.002s ... 0.109s
#10 got single benchmarks 323 +0.047s ... 0.156s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.002s ... 0.158s
#12 got single benchmarks 162 +0.02s ... 0.178s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.178s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.242s