The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 116%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 108%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 02. 01:04:50
#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:08:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.002s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 168 +0.087s ... 0.112s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.002s ... 0.114s
#10 got single benchmarks 323 +0.049s ... 0.163s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.165s
#12 got single benchmarks 322 +0.084s ... 0.249s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.249s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.077s ... 0.326s