The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 108%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 112%n=6
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 21. 11:12:07
#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.002s ... 0.031s
#8 got single benchmarks 168 +0.088s ... 0.119s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0.002s ... 0.122s
#10 got single benchmarks 439 +0.011s ... 0.132s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.002s ... 0.135s
#12 got single benchmarks 162 +0.023s ... 0.158s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.158s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.22s