The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 98%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 108%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 25. 03:19:15
#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.002s ... 0.021s
#8 got single benchmarks 168 +0.091s ... 0.112s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0.002s ... 0.114s
#10 got single benchmarks 442 +0.014s ... 0.127s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.129s
#12 got single benchmarks 322 +0.095s ... 0.224s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.224s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.095s ... 0.319s