Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops based on the old Merom core. It offers only an FSB of 667 MHz and 2 MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a low power Core 2 Duo based on the Merom core that was used in the MacBook Air (but due to throttling could not show the full performance).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2100 MHz1600 MHz
FSB667667800
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt20 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.0375V-1.300V65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$286 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5850 +
2161 Points (18%)
82%
1 SP7500 +
1766 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5850 +
3997 Points (5%)
70%
1 SP7500 +
2781 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
1768 Points (4%)
982 Points (2%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
36.9 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
79.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
1518 s (7%)
2296 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
108%
1 T5850 +
19664 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
119%
1 T5850 +
13902 MFLOPS (11%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 Points (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 Points (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
4516 Points (28%)
2752 Points (17%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5850 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 → 103% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 → 84% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 27. 20:04:10

#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 440 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 382 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.007s

#29 got single benchmarks 168 +0.039s ... 0.046s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 440 +0s ... 0.046s

#31 got single benchmarks 440 +0.007s ... 0.053s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 382 +0s ... 0.054s

#33 got single benchmarks 382 +0.006s ... 0.059s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.061s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#74 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.071s

#75 return log +0s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)