The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 106%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 20. 03:01:14
#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.003s ... 0.046s
#8 got single benchmarks 168 +0.098s ... 0.144s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.003s ... 0.147s
#10 got single benchmarks 407 +0.034s ... 0.181s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.003s ... 0.184s
#12 got single benchmarks 162 +0.025s ... 0.209s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.209s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.079s ... 0.288s