The Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 is an entry level laptop processor based on the Penryn core. It offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6600, the T6670 offers Virtualization VT-x and a higher maximum temperature of 105°C.
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 100%n=11
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 118%n=11
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 133%n=11
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 18. 13:02:09
#0 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.007s
#8 got single benchmarks 467 +0.011s ... 0.018s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0s ... 0.019s
#10 got single benchmarks 421 +0.001s ... 0.019s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0s ... 0.02s
#12 got single benchmarks 449 +0.015s ... 0.035s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.045s