The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).
The Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 is a low power laptop processor for small and slim laptops. It features the full 6 MB level 2 cache and all features of the Penryn core (e.g. VT-x and Trusted Execution). Due to the large cache, the CPU shows a good performance for the small clock rate. However, in the MacBook Air, the CPU throttled very often, leading to the slower benchmarks in our database.
Compared to other Core 2 Duo models, the C2D SL9600 only supports the socket BGA956 and is soldered in the MacBook Air models.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 100%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 101%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 94%n=9
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 25. 13:53:28
#0 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.003s ... 0.028s
#8 got single benchmarks 466 +0.025s ... 0.054s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.003s ... 0.056s
#10 got single benchmarks 380 +0.048s ... 0.104s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0.003s ... 0.107s
#12 got single benchmarks 516 +0.009s ... 0.116s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.126s ... 0.242s