The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 is an entry to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn architecture, but features only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6670, the T6600 does not feature Virtualization features in hardware and is speced at a lower maximum temperature.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6600.
The Core 2 Duo SL9380 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.8 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core. Compared to the SL9400, the SL9380 offers only an FSB with 800 MHz clock rate (instead of 1066) and exactly 1.8 GHz (SL9400 1.86).
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 28. 14:51:45
#0 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 485 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.002s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 466 +0.018s ... 0.043s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 485 +0.002s ... 0.045s
#10 got single benchmarks 485 +0.044s ... 0.089s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0.003s ... 0.091s
#12 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.092s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.161s