The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.
The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 28. 17:18:17
#0 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.001s ... 0.026s
#8 got single benchmarks 466 +0.019s ... 0.045s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0.001s ... 0.047s
#10 got single benchmarks 473 +0.006s ... 0.052s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.002s ... 0.054s
#12 got single benchmarks 422 +0.012s ... 0.065s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.131s