The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 is a low power laptop processor for small and slim laptops. It features the full 6 MB level 2 cache and all features of the Penryn core (e.g. VT-x and Trusted Execution). Due to the large cache, the CPU shows a good performance for the small clock rate. However, in the MacBook Air, the CPU throttled very often, leading to the slower benchmarks in our database.
Compared to other Core 2 Duo models, the C2D SL9600 only supports the socket BGA956 and is soldered in the MacBook Air models.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 100%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 103%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 93%n=9
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 29. 14:24:24
#0 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0.003s ... 0.026s
#8 got single benchmarks 453 +0.048s ... 0.074s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0.003s ... 0.077s
#10 got single benchmarks 421 +0.014s ... 0.091s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0.003s ... 0.094s
#12 got single benchmarks 516 +0.008s ... 0.102s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.095s ... 0.197s