Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T616 vs UNISOC Tangula T700

UNISOC T616

► remove from comparison T616

The Unisoc Tiger T616 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR4x 1866 MHz memory controller and an ARM Mali G57MP1 GPU (750 MHz max) and a dual core ISP (24 and 8 MPixel support). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET. 

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison Tangula T700

The Unisoc Tangula T700 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. Furthermore, the T700 supports 90 Hz displays.

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

show full text
ModelUNISOC T616UNISOC Tangula T700
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
29.2 pt (50%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -63%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 -14%
HiSilicon Kirin 710 -13%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A -13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 -10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 -10%
Mediatek Helio G88 -6%
UNISOC T610 -5%
Mediatek Helio P70 -5%
Mediatek Helio G85 -2%
UNISOC Tangula T700
Mediatek Helio G80 0%
Mediatek Helio P90 0%
MediaTek Dimensity 720 3%
Mediatek Helio G70 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 12%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 13%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 101%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T616 +
3036 Points (38%)
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (36%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T616 +
3063 Points (44%)
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (42%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5574 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1737 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1805 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5131 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T616 +
min: 298     avg: 339     median: 339 (17%)     max: 380 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (17%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T616 +
min: 1184     avg: 1288     median: 1288 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (5%)     max: 1393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T616 +
200006 Points (19%)
186885 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
T616 +
3040 Points (0%)
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
T616 +
24988 Points (68%)
10033 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T616 +
8066 Points (43%)
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (47%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
3.5 Watt (15%)
0123456Tooltip
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (18%)     max: 8.02 Watt
012345678910Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
0.9 Watt (3%)
00.10.20.30.30.40.50.60.70.80.80.911.11.21.31.41.41.51.6Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T616 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 89% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 30. 15:02:04

#0 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.037s ... 0.041s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.042s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0s ... 0.042s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#17 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.007s ... 0.05s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.051s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.002s ... 0.053s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#22 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.006s ... 0.059s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.075s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.083s

#62 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.086s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#64 return log +0.004s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)