Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T616 vs UNISOC T612

UNISOC T616

► remove from comparison  T616

The Unisoc Tiger T616 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR4x 1866 MHz memory controller and an ARM Mali G57MP1 GPU (750 MHz max) and a dual core ISP (24 and 8 MPixel support). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET. 

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison  T612

The Unisoc Tiger T612 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP1 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). Compared to the older Unisoc T610, the T612 offers one GPU core less (G52 MC1 versus MC2).

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

ModelUNISOC T616UNISOC T612
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer T612

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T616 +
3036 Points (38%)
2990 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T616 +
3063 Points (44%)
2942 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T616 +
5574 Points (9%)
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T616 +
1737 Points (35%)
1598 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1805 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5131 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T616 +
min: 298     avg: 339     median: 339 (17%)     max: 380 Points
102%
T612 +
346 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T616 +
min: 1184     avg: 1288     median: 1288 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
103%
T612 +
1322 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T616 +
200006 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
T616 +
3040 Points (0%)
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
T616 +
24988 Points (68%)
11681 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T616 +
8066 Points (43%)
7776 Points (42%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
3.5 Watt (15%)
0123456Tooltip
101%
1 T612 +
3.4 Watt (15%)
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
0.9 Watt (3%)
00.10.20.30.30.40.50.60.70.80.80.911.11.21.31.41.41.51.6Tooltip
99%
1 T612 +
1.1 Watt (4%)
00.20.30.50.60.80.91.11.21.41.61.71.922.22.32.52.62.83Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T616 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 92% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 20:15:32

#0 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.041s ... 0.046s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.049s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.049s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0s ... 0.049s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#17 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.006s ... 0.056s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#21 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.005s ... 0.063s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.067s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.08s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.087s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.09s

#48 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.092s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#50 return log +0.004s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)