Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T610 vs UNISOC Tangula T700

UNISOC T610

► remove from comparison  T610

The Unisoc Tiger T610 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

The Unisoc Tangula T700 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. Furthermore, the T700 supports 90 Hz displays.

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

ModelUNISOC T610UNISOC Tangula T700
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 (614 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T610
27.6 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
29.2 pt (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2784     avg: 2992     median: 2992 (38%)     max: 3200 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (36%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2791     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (43%)     max: 3181 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (42%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 345     avg: 361     median: 351 (17%)     max: 387 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (17%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 1034     avg: 1263     median: 1330 (5%)     max: 1425 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (5%)     max: 1393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
T610 +
39058 Points (33%)
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
T610 +
39644 Points (32%)
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
T610 +
27469 Points (5%)
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
T610 +
65175 Points (24%)
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T610 +
min: 171346     avg: 173534     median: 173534 (17%)     max: 175722 Points
186885 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
T610 +
1942 Points (0%)
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T610 +
min: 7645     avg: 8075     median: 8074.5 (43%)     max: 8504 Points
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (47%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
T610 +
5364 Points (28%)
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
T610 +
16046 Points (34%)
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
T610 +
7337 Points (48%)
8438 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (27%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (18%)     max: 8.02 Watt
012345678910Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T610 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 104% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 11:49:05

#0 checking url part for id 14014 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.052s ... 0.057s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.059s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.063s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 14014 +0.001s ... 0.064s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#19 got single benchmarks 14014 +0.007s ... 0.072s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0s ... 0.075s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#38 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.006s ... 0.082s

#39 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.094s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#83 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.104s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.031s ... 0.136s

#85 return log +0.004s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)