Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T610 vs UNISOC T616

UNISOC T610

► remove from comparison T610

The Unisoc Tiger T610 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

UNISOC T616

► remove from comparison T616

The Unisoc Tiger T616 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR4x 1866 MHz memory controller and an ARM Mali G57MP1 GPU (750 MHz max) and a dual core ISP (24 and 8 MPixel support). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET. 

show full text
ModelUNISOC T610UNISOC T616
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 (614 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T610
27.6 pt (47%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -61%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 -12%
Mediatek Helio P65 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 -10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 -9%
HiSilicon Kirin 710 -8%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A -8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 -5%
Mediatek Helio G88 0%
UNISOC T610
Mediatek Helio P70 0%
Mediatek Helio G85 4%
UNISOC Tangula T700 6%
Mediatek Helio P90 6%
Mediatek Helio G80 7%
MediaTek Dimensity 720 9%
Mediatek Helio G70 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 14%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 113%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2784     avg: 2992     median: 2992 (38%)     max: 3200 Points
101%
T616 +
3036 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2791     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (43%)     max: 3181 Points
103%
T616 +
3063 Points (44%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5574 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1737 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1805 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5131 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 345     avg: 361     median: 351 (17%)     max: 387 Points
min: 298     avg: 339     median: 339 (17%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 1034     avg: 1263     median: 1330 (5%)     max: 1425 Points
min: 1184     avg: 1288     median: 1288 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T610 +
39058 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T610 +
39644 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T610 +
27469 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T610 +
65175 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T610 +
min: 171346     avg: 173534     median: 173534 (17%)     max: 175722 Points
115%
T616 +
200006 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
T610 +
1942 Points (0%)
157%
T616 +
3040 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T610 +
min: 7645     avg: 8075     median: 8074.5 (43%)     max: 8504 Points
100%
T616 +
8066 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T610 +
5364 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T610 +
16046 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T610 +
7337 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T616 +
24988 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
3.5 Watt (15%)
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
0.9 Watt (3%)
00.10.20.30.30.40.50.60.70.80.80.911.11.21.31.41.41.51.6Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T610 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T616 → 110% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 19:09:58

#0 checking url part for id 14014 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.036s ... 0.04s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.042s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.045s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 14014 +0.001s ... 0.047s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#18 got single benchmarks 14014 +0.007s ... 0.054s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0s ... 0.055s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#22 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.006s ... 0.061s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.069s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.088s

#59 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.091s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s ... 0.115s

#61 return log +0.004s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)