Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T610 vs UNISOC T612

UNISOC T610

► remove from comparison  T610

The Unisoc Tiger T610 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison  T612

The Unisoc Tiger T612 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP1 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). Compared to the older Unisoc T610, the T612 offers one GPU core less (G52 MC1 versus MC2).

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

ModelUNISOC T610UNISOC T612
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 (614 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer T612

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T610
27.6 pt (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2784     avg: 2992     median: 2992 (38%)     max: 3200 Points
100%
T612 +
2990 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2791     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (43%)     max: 3181 Points
2942 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
1598 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 345     avg: 361     median: 351 (17%)     max: 387 Points
346 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 1034     avg: 1263     median: 1330 (5%)     max: 1425 Points
1322 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T610 +
39058 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T610 +
39644 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T610 +
27469 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T610 +
65175 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T610 +
min: 171346     avg: 173534     median: 173534 (17%)     max: 175722 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
T610 +
1942 Points (0%)
153%
T612 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T610 +
min: 7645     avg: 8075     median: 8074.5 (43%)     max: 8504 Points
7776 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T610 +
5364 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T610 +
16046 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T610 +
7337 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T612 +
11681 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T612 +
3.4 Watt (15%)
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T612 +
1.1 Watt (4%)
00.20.30.50.60.80.91.11.21.41.61.71.922.22.32.52.62.83Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T610 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 108% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 19:41:16

#0 checking url part for id 14014 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.04s ... 0.044s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.047s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.05s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 14014 +0.001s ... 0.051s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#18 got single benchmarks 14014 +0.007s ... 0.058s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0s ... 0.058s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#22 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.005s ... 0.064s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.08s

#54 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.083s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#56 return log +0.004s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)