The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 104%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 102%n=6
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 23. 23:28:23
#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0.003s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 439 +0.009s ... 0.034s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.002s ... 0.036s
#10 got single benchmarks 162 +0.025s ... 0.061s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.064s
#12 got single benchmarks 322 +0.084s ... 0.148s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.148s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.229s