Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a low power Core 2 Duo based on the Merom core that was used in the MacBook Air (but due to throttling could not show the full performance).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2000 MHz1600 MHz
FSB800800800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt20 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm1.075V-1.175V65 nm
SocketSocket PPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7250

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (19%)     max: 2093 Points
1766 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (5%)     max: 3822 Points
2781 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
982 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26 s (6%)
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
36.9 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
65 s (3%)
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
79.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
96%
1 SP7500 +
2296 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
18700 MIPS (9%)
97%
1 T7250 +
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
89%
1 T7250 +
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4639 Points (29%)
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
2752 Points (17%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 96% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 → 77% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 19. 11:04:50

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 382 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#61 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#62 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#63 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.007s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#65 got single benchmarks 439 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#66 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#68 got single benchmarks 340 +0.024s ... 0.04s

#69 getting avg benchmarks for device 382 +0s ... 0.04s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#71 got single benchmarks 382 +0.006s ... 0.046s

#72 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#124 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.057s

#125 return log +0s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)