Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7100

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 was a entry level to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuringonly half of the 4 MB level 2 cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz1800 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
SocketSocket PPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTSpeedStep, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
$197 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7100

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
1817 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
3419 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
min: 1358     avg: 1500     median: 1535.5 (3%)     max: 1550 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26 s (6%)
31 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
65 s (3%)
71 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7100 +
1614 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18700 MIPS (9%)
min: 16039     avg: 16240     median: 16239.5 (8%)     max: 16440 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 11409     avg: 11484     median: 11483.5 (9%)     max: 11558 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4639 Points (29%)
min: 3068     avg: 3956     median: 4040 (25%)     max: 4660 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 → 89% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 17:37:33

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 325 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 439 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 325 +0s ... 0.013s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.014s

#44 got single benchmarks 325 +0.025s ... 0.039s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#74 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.045s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#76 return log +0.004s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)